ÍæÅ¼½ã½ã

UNDT/2025/041

UNDT/2025/041, Cristian Mazzei

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Tribunal noted that the issue of contention was whether a staff member seconded to the Secretariat, from a fund or programme in the United Nations System, is “serving with the United Nations Secretariat under a fixed-term appointment†for purposes of eligibility for a continuing appointment. At the time of the contested decision, the Applicant was a staff member of UNICEF (a Programme) but serving on secondment in UNEP (part of the Secretariat).

Based on the evidence on record, the Tribunal concluded that it was clear that under the Inter-Organization Agreement and the letters of appointment issued by the Secretariat to effectuate the secondment, the Applicant was a staff member of the Secretariat during his secondment. Thus, he was eligible to be considered for a continuing appointment in 2016 and 2017 and the contested decision was unlawful in that regard.

Accordingly, the Tribunal:

a. Granted the application; and

b. Rescinded the decision denying the Applicant a continuing appointment in the review exercise for 2016 and 2017.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision of 2 February 2024 of the Assistant Secretary-General for Human Resources not to grant him a continuing appointment.

Legal Principle(s)

Pursuant to the settled jurisprudence and the applicable law, the Applicant must be staff member of the Secretariat to be eligible for consideration for a continuing appointment.

Outcome
Judgment entered for Applicant in full or in part
Outcome Extra Text

The Tribunal rescinded the decision denying the Applicant a continuing appointment in the review exercise for 2016 and 2017.

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.