UNDT/2025/041, Cristian Mazzei
The Tribunal noted that the issue of contention was whether a staff member seconded to the Secretariat, from a fund or programme in the United Nations System, is “serving with the United Nations Secretariat under a fixed-term appointment†for purposes of eligibility for a continuing appointment. At the time of the contested decision, the Applicant was a staff member of UNICEF (a Programme) but serving on secondment in UNEP (part of the Secretariat).
Based on the evidence on record, the Tribunal concluded that it was clear that under the Inter-Organization Agreement and the letters of appointment issued by the Secretariat to effectuate the secondment, the Applicant was a staff member of the Secretariat during his secondment. Thus, he was eligible to be considered for a continuing appointment in 2016 and 2017 and the contested decision was unlawful in that regard.
Accordingly, the Tribunal:
a. Granted the application; and
b. Rescinded the decision denying the Applicant a continuing appointment in the review exercise for 2016 and 2017.
The Applicant contested the decision of 2 February 2024 of the Assistant Secretary-General for Human Resources not to grant him a continuing appointment.
Pursuant to the settled jurisprudence and the applicable law, the Applicant must be staff member of the Secretariat to be eligible for consideration for a continuing appointment.
The Tribunal rescinded the decision denying the Applicant a continuing appointment in the review exercise for 2016 and 2017.