Íæż½ã½ã

UNDT/2012/063

View PDF

UNDT/2012/063, Philippi

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The terms of settlement have been agreed between the parties, and the Applicant has confirmed that the said terms have been fully implemented and that there are no outstanding claims arising from the employment with the Respondent. In the circumstances, it is the judgment of the Tribunal that the case be closed.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

#

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome
Closed on withdrawal

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Full judgment
Applicants/Appellants
Philippi
Entity
UNDP
Case Number(s)
UNDT/NY/2010/001/UNAT/1563
Tribunal
UNDT
Registry
New York
Date of Judgement
Duty Judge
Judge Meeran
Language of Judgment
English
Issuance Type
Judgment
Categories/Subcategories
Ombudsman / informal resolution